<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>colour grading on pho.tography.org</title>
    <link>https://pho.tography.org/tags/colour-grading/</link>
    <description>Recent content in colour grading on pho.tography.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pho.tography.org/tags/colour-grading/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Night Street Photography on a Fast Telephoto: The Technical Choices Behind a Cinematic Frame</title>
      <link>https://pho.tography.org/night-street-photography-on-a-fast-telephoto-the-technical-choices-behind-a-cinematic-frame/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://pho.tography.org/night-street-photography-on-a-fast-telephoto-the-technical-choices-behind-a-cinematic-frame/</guid>
      <description>A frame like this one looks like a still from a film, and people usually credit the grade for that. The grade is the last five percent. Everything that makes it read as cinema was decided at the moment of shooting: how far back I stood, what focal length I put between me and the subject, how much of the background I let dissolve, and which of the four or five competing light sources I let win.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
