<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>computer vision on pho.tography.org</title>
    <link>https://pho.tography.org/tags/computer-vision/</link>
    <description>Recent content in computer vision on pho.tography.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pho.tography.org/tags/computer-vision/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Can a Website With Only Original Photos Rank on Google Without Text?</title>
      <link>https://pho.tography.org/can-a-website-with-only-original-photos-rank-on-google-without-text/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://pho.tography.org/can-a-website-with-only-original-photos-rank-on-google-without-text/</guid>
      <description>I&amp;rsquo;ll admit I&amp;rsquo;ve half-believed this one. Google&amp;rsquo;s models can look at a photo and tell you it shows a Corinthian column, a few tourists, late afternoon light, and a gelato sign in Italian. Gemini will write a better paragraph about your picture than most people write in their captions. So why would a site full of original photography need prose at all? If the machine can read the image, the image is the content.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
