<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ef adapter on pho.tography.org</title>
    <link>https://pho.tography.org/tags/ef-adapter/</link>
    <description>Recent content in ef adapter on pho.tography.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pho.tography.org/tags/ef-adapter/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 on the R100 Via Adapter: A Cheaper Path to the 135mm Full-Frame Look</title>
      <link>https://pho.tography.org/canon-ef-85mm-f/1.8-on-the-r100-via-adapter-a-cheaper-path-to-the-135mm-full-frame-look/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://pho.tography.org/canon-ef-85mm-f/1.8-on-the-r100-via-adapter-a-cheaper-path-to-the-135mm-full-frame-look/</guid>
      <description>The 135mm f/2 has near-mythical status among event and reportage shooters: it compresses backgrounds, isolates a subject from a crowded room, and lets you work a few rows back without feeling like you&amp;rsquo;re in someone&amp;rsquo;s face. But at full-frame prices, it&amp;rsquo;s a hard lens to justify for a working shooter who doesn&amp;rsquo;t need it every day. There&amp;rsquo;s a cheaper way to get most of the way there — and it starts with a lens most people already own.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
