<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>gfx on pho.tography.org</title>
    <link>https://pho.tography.org/tags/gfx/</link>
    <description>Recent content in gfx on pho.tography.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pho.tography.org/tags/gfx/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Fujifilm GFX 100S II &#43; GF 110mm f/2: Medium Format Logic</title>
      <link>https://pho.tography.org/2026/04/12/fujifilm-gfx-100s-ii--gf-110mm-f/2-medium-format-logic/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://pho.tography.org/2026/04/12/fujifilm-gfx-100s-ii--gf-110mm-f/2-medium-format-logic/</guid>
      <description>The argument for medium format has always been tonal, not pixel-numeric. Photographers who have shot both full-frame and medium format systems at comparable resolutions consistently describe a difference in rendering — a three-dimensionality, a tonal gradation in transitions from light to shadow — that specification sheets struggle to quantify. The Fujifilm GFX 100S II paired with the GF 110mm f/2 is the most accessible entry point into that argument that currently exists.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
