<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>third-party lenses on pho.tography.org</title>
    <link>https://pho.tography.org/tags/third-party-lenses/</link>
    <description>Recent content in third-party lenses on pho.tography.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pho.tography.org/tags/third-party-lenses/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>7Artisans Sells a 135mm F1.8 for $689 and Canon RF Owners Still Can&#39;t Buy One</title>
      <link>https://pho.tography.org/7artisans-sells-a-135mm-f1.8-for-689-and-canon-rf-owners-still-cant-buy-one/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://pho.tography.org/7artisans-sells-a-135mm-f1.8-for-689-and-canon-rf-owners-still-cant-buy-one/</guid>
      <description>I bought into Canon on purpose. Not once — twice. The R8 for full frame, the R100 for the days I want something I won&amp;rsquo;t cry about dropping. I like Canon&amp;rsquo;s color science, I like where Canon puts its buttons, and I have defended the RF system in conversations where defending it made me look like a hostage. Nobody tricked me into this mount. I walked in.
So understand that what follows isn&amp;rsquo;t brand tribalism.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
