<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>wifi on pho.tography.org</title>
    <link>https://pho.tography.org/tags/wifi/</link>
    <description>Recent content in wifi on pho.tography.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pho.tography.org/tags/wifi/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Camera WiFi Standards: Who Leads, Who Lags</title>
      <link>https://pho.tography.org/2026/04/18/camera-wifi-standards-who-leads-who-lags/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://pho.tography.org/2026/04/18/camera-wifi-standards-who-leads-who-lags/</guid>
      <description>Wireless connectivity in cameras has never been a marketing priority. Megapixels sell. Autofocus systems sell. WiFi module generations do not. Which is exactly why the gap between what Canon is shipping in 2024–2025 and what the other major brands are offering is larger than it should be, and largely unreported.
A quick orientation: the relevant standards in current camera hardware are WiFi 4 (802.11n, introduced 2009), WiFi 5 (802.11ac, introduced 2013), and WiFi 6 (802.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
