Deciding Between a Used Canon RP and a Used Canon R100: Weighing the Options
When it comes to choosing between two used cameras, the decision can feel like a tug-of-war between performance, features, and value. In my case, the choice is between the full-frame Canon RP, priced at $570, and the APS-C Canon R100, available for just $230. While both cameras belong to Canon’s RF ecosystem, they cater to vastly different needs, making this comparison a blend of technical trade-offs and practical considerations.
The Canon RP, launched as an entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera, marked a significant moment for affordable full-frame photography. Its larger sensor provides superior low-light performance, better dynamic range, and a more pronounced ability to achieve shallow depth of field—ideal for portraits, landscapes, and professional-grade photography. It features a fully articulating touchscreen, making it a versatile choice for vloggers or photographers shooting at unconventional angles. The RP’s premium build quality, intuitive controls, and robust design make it a reliable tool for enthusiasts or professionals seeking to elevate their craft.
On the other hand, the Canon R100, released much more recently, benefits from advancements in technology. While it features a smaller APS-C sensor, it excels in areas where the RP lags due to age. Its autofocus system is notably more advanced, offering faster, more accurate subject tracking and making it ideal for fast-paced shooting environments. The R100 also boasts better battery life, enabling longer shooting sessions without the need for frequent battery changes—a significant advantage for travel or events. At just 445 grams with a kit lens and battery, it’s incredibly lightweight and compact, perfect for everyday photography or as a travel companion.
Perhaps the most striking difference between the two is price. The R100’s low cost leaves room in the budget for additional lenses and accessories, a crucial factor when entering Canon’s RF system. While the RP offers access to Canon’s full-frame RF lenses, these lenses can be prohibitively expensive. The ability to allocate more money toward lenses—perhaps a quality prime or versatile zoom—means the R100 buyer can immediately start building a system tailored to their needs. The R100 also supports EF and EF-S lenses with a cheap adapter, retaining full autofocus functionality. This makes it a cost-effective choice for those transitioning from older Canon DSLRs with an existing lens collection.
Yet, the RP’s full-frame sensor is hard to overlook for those seeking top-tier image quality. It handles challenging lighting conditions better, offers a wider field of view without crop, and produces images with greater depth and detail. While the R100’s APS-C sensor adds a 1.6x crop factor, which can be beneficial for telephoto work, it limits the utility of wide-angle lenses. Additionally, the RP’s articulating touchscreen enhances usability for video and creative angles, whereas the R100 relies on fixed-button controls and lacks a touchscreen altogether.
Video performance adds another layer to the debate. The RP records in 4K but with a 1.6x crop factor and downgraded autofocus, which can be limiting. Meanwhile, the R100, despite its 4K capabilities, faces a heavy crop and lacks dual-pixel autofocus in this mode. Both cameras, therefore, shine better in HD recording, with the R100’s newer autofocus technology giving it a slight edge. However, for vloggers or creators, the RP’s articulating screen remains a compelling advantage, while the R100’s reliance on a smartphone as an external monitor feels like a clever but less elegant workaround.
Handling and control also differ. The RP’s dual command dials and more extensive physical controls make manual adjustments easier, while the R100’s single control dial requires more menu navigation. However, for those accustomed to shooting in aperture or shutter priority modes, this limitation may not be a dealbreaker. The R100’s newer design also incorporates thoughtful improvements, such as customizable buttons and efficient power management.
Ultimately, the decision between these two cameras is as much about priorities as it is about features. The Canon RP is a fantastic option for those looking to step into full-frame photography, offering a rich and immersive shooting experience with room to grow. However, the Canon R100’s affordability, portability, and newer technology make it an unbeatable value for casual shooters or anyone looking to explore Canon’s RF system without significant upfront investment. The R100’s lower price also means the ability to expand into lenses and accessories, a factor that can greatly enhance its overall utility.
For me, the R100’s lightweight design, better autofocus, and budget-friendliness make it a strong contender. While the RP’s full-frame advantages are tempting, the practical benefits of the R100 are hard to ignore. It’s a capable, modern camera that delivers great results at a fraction of the cost, leaving room for system growth. Whether you prioritize the prestige of full-frame or the practicality of a newer, simpler system, both cameras offer compelling value for their respective markets. Choosing between them boils down to how you plan to use them—and what you value most in a camera.